Monthly Call For Life

My Photo
Location: Virginia, United States

Wednesday, July 26, 2006

The "embryos" only have us - Now is time for action

To most of us in the pro-life world this may seem like a stupid question, but this question is not so stupid to the rest of the world when you consider the statements that they make. The question is, is an embryo a human being?

Tony Snow - July 19 White House Press Release

( photo)

MR. SNOW: "And I'll tell you what, it's worth pointing out one thing -- actually several things on stem cells. Number one, the President is the first ever to have financed research using embryonic stem cell lines."

Yes, President Bush was the first president to finance, with taxpayer dollars, "research using embryonic (human) stem cell lines". Human beings are killed at the order of our United States President.

It's time to get real with this issue. Republican and Democrat representatives do not respect life in the womb. We have to stop pretending they do.

> Have they stopped abortion?
> Have they stopped the killing of undesired females or males in the womb?
> Have they stopped genetic testing and selection in the womb?
> Did they not almost get away with the wholesale slaughter of human beings through "embryonic" stem cell research last week?

Neither of them understand the scientific horror that is occuring. Neither of them understand the scientific manipulation of human life in American society today. Both parties support embryonic stem cell research and haven't the foggiest idea of what "pluripotent" means. I'll leave that one for another article.

Mr. Snow then said:

"As a matter of fact, what the bioethics council said is that this precise kind of research, because it does not place in jeopardy the life of a human being -- which is what many people think that the embryo is, and that is what the President believes -- you do not engage in morally controversial research when you find ways to back-engineer adult or blood cord cells."

So why did he authorize the killing of embryos (humans) for research back in 2001? That is one of the reasons we as a nation have gone down the slipperly slope of this type of research, and is one reason why the house and senate passed embryonic (human) stem cell research bills.

If President Bush would have spoken up then and said "no, the United States government won't support experimenting on living human beings", and if he would have pressed for laws protecting human beings in the womb, we wouldn't be debating this insanity today.

Tony then goes on to say:

"This is a President who's spent more money on embryonic stem cell research and stem cell research generally than any President in American history. He's got the track record. What's happening now is that people are trying to politicize it by accusing him of standing in the way of science, when he's the guy who's made it possible to open up the way to science."

Really? Let me get this straight, an embryo is a human and it's also not a human? Back to the press briefing:

"Q What's the point of having the snowflakes here today? What's the message of that?

MR. SNOW: The message is that an embryo can produce a human being, and there will be some in evidence."

The double speak from Mr. Snow seems endless. This is from the July 18 press briefing:

"What the President has done is he has provided access to previously existing embryonic stem cell lines, which are responsible for the vast bulk of research in the entire world,"

Back to the 19th briefing:

“Q The legislation is going to be -- that deals with thousands and thousands of embryos that will be thrown out, destroyed.

MR. SNOW: That is a tragedy, but the President is not going to get on the slippery slope of taking something that is living and making it dead for the purpose of research.”

I'm still struggling with the fact that we allowed research on living human beings in 2001. How many times have you heard that the embryos (humans) in fertility clinics will just be “destroyed” anyway?

Fertility clinics are murder centers of the highest order. We struggle with our humanity and are distraught when we are not able to conceive children of our own. What do we turn to? Science of course. Scientists mix sperm with eggs & implant them over & over into a woman until that woman delivers a human being. Usually, not just one. Many women who have gone through fertility treatments have more than 1 child. Often times they have twins, and other times there were actually more than two. Why do we see so many women who have had fertility treatments with twins and not more than two? Because the rest of her children have been killed through a clinically named process called “selective reduction” A doctor tells the woman that the likelihood of being able to deliver more than 2 children are not good. He/she explains the dangers of delivering so many children in a way that the mother naturally chooses to just have two. Why not? After all, if she elects to deliver more, her life or the lives of all the children might be in jeopardy, right?

Look at this web site:

Their tagline is “From infertility to family”

Here’s what they have to say about selective reduction:

“For many such women, carrying twins would likely present an unacceptable risk. However, most women undergoing IVF can usually tolerate and many even covet a twin pregnancy.

High-order multiple pregnancy (triplets or greater multiples) is another matter altogether since the increased incidence of prematurity poses an inordinate threat to the wellbeing of the mother and her babies. What is more, the higher the multiple, the greater the hazard.”

“Selective reduction of pregnancy is usually performed prior to completion of the third month of gestation. It involves the injection of a chemical under ultrasound guidance directly into one or more developing concepti to reduce the total number, usually to twins. This is soon followed by absorption of the products of conception by the body.”

Isn't that immoral? On the contrary, they say it is more moral do it and compare women who kill their children to heros:

In such circumstances, selective pregnancy reduction could be regarded as a moral decision aimed at optimizing the quality of life after birth. Furthermore, given the heart-rendering nature of the decision, selective pregnancy reduction might even be considered laudable.

“concepti”? Oh, you mean human being. So you kill the other people in the body of the woman by injecting a chemical into them which then kills them right?

IVF centers are murder facilities. The “leftover” human beings (embryos) which people say are going to be destroyed anyway, shouldn’t have been created that way in the first place, but now that they are there, they should be allowed to be born, and the process of IVF should stop immediately!

We’re not going to a slippery slope, we have already slid all the way down. Here are the many reasons we kill our children today:

Gender selection (genetic testing)
Population control
Mercy killing (don’t want to bring up a child in this cruel society)

Obviously there are many more reasons why we kill human beings in the womb today. The real slipperly slope of today is killing our toddlers, the elderly & the sick. Ask the Netherlands about that, they already kill of their toddlers if it is believed they won’t live a satisfactory lifestyle.

Euthanasia is becoming the method of choice for killing the elderly & sick the world over.

The question isn’t are embryos human beings, we know they are. The question is, are decent American and global citizens going to stand up to politicians and demand an end to the killing of innocent human beings in the womb.

Are you doing everything you can for the unborn? Are you calling and emailing your representatives regularly? If not, join us in the Monthly Call for Life at We help you with who to call, when to call and what to say.

We need to unite and speak out in one common message. Join us, and tell everyone you know to speak out against abortion, embryonic research and other research technologies which involve killing innocent life.

The unborn only have us because they obviously cannot speak for themselves.

United we stand - Divided they die - Pass it on

Friday, July 14, 2006

Face the Truth Tour Starts Next Week

Make plans now to join Defend Life for our 6th Annual Face the Truth Tour in the Washington D.C. area monday, July 17 through Friday, July 21. Help us show America the ugly truth of aborton. Stops include Manassas, Hagerstown, Frederick, Washington, DC Naval Observatory, Randallstown, Rockville, Washington, DC Holocaust Museum and many more.

Go to and click on "Updated Face the Truth Tour information" for more information.

Join us and show your support for the movement, and help DEFEND LIFE!

Thursday, July 13, 2006

The folly of embryonic stem cell research

Congress is trying to push through embryonic stem cell research claiming it can be the fountain of youth elixer. Proponents of this research claim that it might cure paralysis, alzheimers and other terrible afflictions.

Here's the main problem, embryonic stem cell research involves killing human beings in order to make lives better for other human beings. The Nazis did this & we condemed them for it.

Let's look at the first pool of humans that they are going after, the frozen embryos left over from in vitro fertilization. In the beginning they will ask permission from the parents of these embryos (maybe), but in the end they will figure out how to seize them. Fertility clinics will also come up with new contracts which will guarantee their right of ownership after a successful implantation. Then they will sell left over humans for a hefty fee.

Here is a clip from a article from a year ago:

Supporters point out there are embryos in fertility clinics that would never be used to create babies, but could be used for research purposes.

We trust our representatives don't we? Should we? Reagon said "trust but verify", so why don't we have a board of people defending morality in government? Our government is getting bigger than itself and no longer has the capability to understand right from wrong. Why? Because right and wrong are intangible. Because we can't put our hands on them, they morph over time from one thing to another. That is why abortion, the decriminilized murder of innocent human beings, kills over one million people a year in America alone. What other horrible things are happening?

> Sex selection - Gender selection facilities are doing a booming business. People are also flying to America to choose the gender of their children. Not happy with your daughter? Catch her early enough in the womb, kill her & try for a boy.
> Selective reduction - The process of killing "extra" children when women have been impregnated by IVF. Haven't you ever heard of couples who have gone through IVF having twins? They didn't have just two to start with. They might have started with as many as 4 or 5. The doctor tells them that the mother will struggle to deliver so many and that 1 or 2 might die in the process anyway, so they recommend selective reduction to increase the chances of all.
> Euthanasia - Terri Schiavo was just the tip of the iceberg. Since her execution hospices have been killing people across America like flies. We were lucky enough to save Andrea Clark before her execution in Texas, but many more haven't and won't live.
> Baby body parts from abortions have been sold on the open market. How can an abortion not be the killing of a human being when the abortion results in the sale of an eyeball or a liver?

I believe an oversight board that keeps tabs on moral issues needs to be established in government, one that helps maintain a set of rules that define what it means to be human. Our representatives in government have lost their moral compass. They put their fingers up to see which way the election wind blows while putting out their palms to organizations who will finance their next election.

I thought Democrats were the party of the little guy? I thought they were the ones who were supposed to protest en masse, defending those who can't defend themselves. Maybe they were hijacked, but now they are the party of death, supporting legislation which kills human beings. If we're not careful, the Republican party will join them.

Definition of folly from

- A lack of good sense, understanding, or foresight.
- An act or instance of foolishness: regretted the follies of his youth.
- A costly undertaking having an absurd or ruinous outcome.
follies (used with a sing. or pl. verb) An elaborate theatrical revue consisting of music, dance, and skits.

Perilously or criminally foolish action.
Evil; wickedness.
Lewdness; lasciviousness.

It's interesting to note what is now obsolete. Isn't that an example of redefining morality? Let's not let the same thing happen with our government. Help us challenge the culture of death and join our effort to end abortion in America. We unite once a month on the first Friday to call, email and/or picket to let our representatives know we want them to stop abortion and human research. On the first Saturday following the first Friday we go to abortion mills to pray for the women and the children that they will kill. Many turn away when they realize what they are going to do.

Even if all you do is call and/or email on the first Friday, that's good enough. The unborn need you to speak for them.

Call your representatives over the next week. They are debating whether or not to use living human beings for scientific research. Embryonic stem cell research is wrong and we need to let them know how we feel. Go to for more information on how to contact them and for what more you can do.

If you don't do it who will?

United we stand - Divided they die - Pass it on

Wednesday, July 12, 2006

Attacks from the "intellectual" left

A kind person who disagrees with me was nice enough to point out that people were posting my personal information, which resulted in many phone calls that I did not enjoy.

Point one - My article was a joke, which obviously thousands of you didn't get, all the while accusing me of being the stupidest person on the planet.

Point two - I never deleted one single comment. I left the thousands of comments there to show how so many people have a cow about information that they don't like. The "freedom of speech" crowd didn't like my speech, so they cussed me at me for days. No problem, it's just people wigging out I figured.

Then came the commenter Bill. He decided that I don't have a right to say what I want to say because obviously I am too stupid for him. So what did he do? He posted my personal information online, inviting all to call me and let me know. Others joined him. A total of 5 people posted my personal information.

So these people ruined the fun for all & I had to shut down the comments section. It is often the case that one person ruins the fun of many isn't it?

Summing up the "Onion" flap

The hate mail continues to flow in like water. The "intellectual left" continues to throw every cuss word in the dictionary at me. (yes, I said "cuss", not "curse", that drives them nuts too...past experience, believe me)

I won't be responding to any more of the hate mail so don't bother writing it. I created a mail rule which will automatically trash it. No, we won't open up our comments to you people who have nothing better to do than fill our comments up with your hate. Funny, how come you members of the "intellectual left" can't say two sentences without cussing?

Oh well, about the Onion article

99% of that satirical piece is purporting to describe (in a "satirical" way) the physical and emotional pain of the abortion to the woman, not the baby. This statement really tells it all:

"The funny thing is, I actually have the pro-life movement to thank for this opportunity. If my HMO wouldn't have bowed to their pressure not to cover oral contraceptives, I never would've gotten pregnant in the first place."

Do you see how they slip their agenda into a "satirical" piece? Oral contraceptives cause abortions too, just at an earlier stage than hospital abortions. Contraception is the direction of the pro-abortion movement, because they know America is waking up to the fact that abortion kills human beings and it should not have been decriminalized by the Supreme Court.

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

College Ejumacated

It's fascinating the number of personal attacks I've been getting since I responded to the "satire" piece from the Onion. It's also funny to me how pro-aborts claim such brilliance, yet struggle to say a sentence or two without cuss words.

The last person said "I don't know any college educated folks who don't know the site", which proves my point that our children are brainwashed in the public school system. Of course the person who wrote that probably only knows people like him, rude, nasty & thrive on personal attacks.

He signed his string of filth with

"Color me stunned ... douchebag"

His name is douchebag? ...& what color is "stunned"?

Monday, July 10, 2006


Talk about getting people mad. I wrote a blog on Caroline Weber who wrote her "satire" piece titled "I am totally psyched for this abortion!".

This article is not for kids or the weak spirited.

First of all, who are we talking about? We are talking about a woman who supports the murder of over 3,000 babies/human beings every single day. We are talking about a woman who supports the suctioning out of brains from human beings to collapse their skulls in order to remove their dead carcases from the women who have chosen to kill their children. A woman who likely supports the killing of a fully developed 9 month old baby so that the poor mother doesn't have to buy diapers, or live with the trauma of having to raise a child.

Needless to say, a few people wanted to let me know that I was a dolt for thinking that her article was real. As a matter of fact, call me a dolt, because in the beginning I really did think it was real. Why? because I meet women like her in the field all the time. Anyway, I wrote the blog in a way that was meant to point out how psychotic the pro-abortion movement is. I have been at abortion mills, picketed government buildings, parks and more. I have heard a lot, and if you think that this woman just "sounded" nuts, let me tell you what a woman told me a couple of months ago.

A woman was watching us put up GAP (genocidal awareness project) signs. She was lying on a blanket enjoying the summer day. I went up to her after we got them up & asked her what she thought about them. She said that they were horrible and that she knows what abortion is & that it can be horrible. I thought she was on the pro-life side. I was wrong. She followed it up with the usual pro-abort midstream thinker statement "I disagree with it, but I wouldn't tell a woman what to do with her body". I did a double-take & continued the conversation. "Why wouldn't you have the right to tell a woman that she can't kill her child?" I asked.

Because it's the way things go
> What do you mean?
There are just things that happen the way they do
> What?
There are many things that happen & we don't have control over them, that's just the way it is
> An abortion is just killing a child at an early age right?
> And that's ok with you?
Might be
> "Ok, let me pose this scenario to you, let's say there's a woman standing in front of you. Her young daughter is yanking at her dress pulling on it saying "mama" over & over, let's say she's a real pest.
> Then, suddenly, her mother reaches down & strangles that child to death. Is that okay with you?
Might be

About this time I have goose bumps & for one of those many moments in my life I'm really scared of another human being.

> I say, all right, how about this, a man comes up to you & rapes you viciously, cuts your throat & throws your lifeless body to the ground, only to walk away with a smile on his face...would that be okay with you?

Her - would just be the way things go, so be it.

Let me tell you, this conversation lasted a while & I couldn't believe the things she was saying. She spoke with a perfectly straight face, was totally honest, & scared me out of my mind. I believe that people who believe that the murder of children/human beings in the womb are the ones who have lost their minds & should be feared.

Mess Weber summed up her article with:

"If my HMO wouldn’t have bowed to their pressure not to cover oral contraceptives, I never would’ve gotten pregnant in the first place."

Exactly, people like her blame their pregnancies and consequential abortions on the pro-life movement. It's all our fault that she would go to bed with a man who would be more than happy to get her pregnant.

Finally, let's look at some words of wisdom from one of the angry people:

"You are slavers who want women as nothing more than broodmares. Slavers are an evil pox on humanity and it's usually you religious freaks that do it in the name of GOD. This was a satire you f___ing sanctimonious slavers! If you are the best humanity has to offer, then we are all doomed!"

Now there's a pro-abort meltdown for you.

Satire? Was the article aiming at the women who have the abortions or the people who believe it is better to save lives than kill them?

Hmm, let's look up the term satire:

“witty language used to convey insults or scorn; "he used sarcasm to upset his opponent"”

Either way, I think I did a good job of turning the “satire” right back at them, don’t you?

United we stand - Divided they die - Pass it on

Thursday, July 06, 2006

Murder without conscience

Can you face the truth? This is what you all are laughing at. This is what you are responsible for. Go ahead, laugh at abortion if you can. The abortion "choice" means, death to a human being at a rate of over 3,000 every single day. That's like having a 9/11 attack every day. 50 million human beings have been killed by a woman's right to choose. Like I always say, what are you choosing? You're pregnant, you're having a ____.

Click here for our blog homepage

Here are some quotes from a pro-abortion person, Miss Caroline Weber, who wrote an article at The Onion online magazine.

The Onion Article

When referring to the killing of her child she said:

"I am totally psyched for this abortion!"

"Those pro-life activists made it pretty clear that, unlike me, they actually think abortion is bad and to be avoided. Are they nuts? Abortion is the best!"

"It wasn't until now that I was lucky enough to be pregnant with a child I had no means to support."

"I just know it's going to be the best non-anesthetized invasive uterine surgery ever!"

Who does Miss Weber blame her abortion on? The pro-life movement.

"The funny thing is, I actually have the pro-life movement to thank for this opportunity."

It's our fault? She says:

"If my HMO wouldn't have bowed to their pressure not to cover oral contraceptives, I never would've gotten pregnant in the first place."

Sorry ma'am, if you hadn't had sex you wouldn't have gotten pregnant, it's not the HMO's fault for not supporting your promiscuity while not married.

To sum it up, Miss Weber said:

"I realize there are people who will criticize me, calling me selfish and immature because I took "the easy way out." I realize there are those who will condemn me to hell for what I'm about to do. Well, I don't care what they say: It's worth it for all the fun and laughs I'm going to have at the clinic. So listen up, world: I'm pro-abortion... and I love it! See you at my post-abortion party, everybody!"

Miss Weber, you have killed your child, which you admit is a baby/human being, intentionally. That does make you an admitted murderer. I'm not going to "condemn you to hell", I'm going to pray for your forgiveness and for the suffering which you will endure when you realize what you have done. Every baby you see from that moment on is going to wake you up to the realization that you killed your child.

Speak out against abortion. Don't just complain about it. Join the Monthly Call for Life at We call, email and/or march to let our representatives know that we will not stop until they stop the killing of innocent human beings!

United we stand - Divided they die - Pass it on